Swap intents and cipher tests need reproducible decisions
A simple result is more useful when its constraints and reasoning remain available.

The NEAR-linked integration account describes an intent service joining another swap interface: users specify the desired outcome while providers compete to complete it. Removing bridge and intermediate-asset choices from the surface shifts more responsibility to the completion record. It should preserve the original constraints, selected route, delivered assets and finality time.
The comparison with language models tackling classical ciphers makes the evidence problem concrete. A convincing plaintext guess can be checked against the method and key, just as a swap result can be checked against the requested amount and conditions. Unresolved steps should remain visible. Portable instructions are useful when another operator can reconstruct why an outcome was accepted, rather than merely seeing a confident answer.