Back to collectionCard production is on track; the chain approach is not settled
Background: The studio has reached its mid-quarter review for the second quarter. Today: After reviewing the work item by item in the meeting, the team confirmed that card production was on target, but the chain approach remained unresolved. Impact and next steps: The review made a clear distinction between “production is on schedule” and “the technical approach is undecided,” preventing card output from obscuring the integration problem.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
Background: The studio has reached its mid-quarter review for the second quarter. It needs to confirm that the card project is producing as planned while facing the wallet and chain questions discussed for days. A-Zhen is responsible for technical integration, and the team must distinguish what has met its targets from what remains stuck at a choice.
Today: After reviewing the work item by item in the meeting, the team confirmed that card production was on target, but the chain approach remained unresolved. Art and production can continue, yet there is still no path the team accepts for how players will hold cards after buying them or use fewer wallet steps. Someone suggested mapping the experience first, so that unclear on-chain steps would not be forced into the demo just to meet a deadline.
Impact and next steps: The review made a clear distinction between “production is on schedule” and “the technical approach is undecided,” preventing card output from obscuring the integration problem. The team decided to keep content work moving while A-Zhen continues mapping the player flow. Until they find an acceptable wallet approach, the on-chain implementation cannot be considered solved.