Mint Limits and Randomness Move Under Internal Review

Background: The project had shifted from naming and visual discussions to mint preparation. Any ambiguity in the contract’s rules could ultimately affect players’ wallets and card distribution. A-Zhen wanted the review to do more than confirm that the code ran; it should also find disputes that might arise at edge cases.

Today: The contract entered an internal audit, with mint limits and randomness as the main focus. The first determined how many a wallet or participant could mint; the second affected whether outcomes could be trusted. The review thus focused on rules players were most likely to question, rather than only checking that the code worked.

Impact and next: Preparation had reached a closer examination of rules and fairness, making the risks more concrete than simply confirming that the process ran. The internal audit was still underway, with no conclusion yet on whether issues existed or how to address them. The team needed to wait for its findings and then decide which rules required clearer explanation.