Back to collectionGame and Chain Teams Trace the Same Player Action
Background: A Final Form deck test had already passed through the chain interface, but the two teams still needed to compare what appeared in the game with what the development network recorded. Today: Joint integration week began, and the chain and game teams moved into one room. Impact and next steps: Problems that once required messages back and forth could now be reproduced and compared on the spot.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
Background: A Final Form deck test had already passed through the chain interface, but the two teams still needed to compare what appeared in the game with what the development network recorded. Before their joint work began, A-Zhen, a chain engineer, worried that separate explanations of the same fault could consume a whole day.
Today: Joint integration week began, and the chain and game teams moved into one room. An action appeared complete in the game while the chain side was still awaiting its corresponding response. Instead of deciding at once which side was at fault, they retraced the sequence from the player's action and agreed to record where the accounts diverged.
Impact and next steps: Problems that once required messages back and forth could now be reproduced and compared on the spot. A-Zhen proposed a shared, ordered list of issues so both teams could check when the display and chain state matched. The precise point of failure still had to be identified.