Back to collectionOffchain Labs Takes the Named Endorsement Role
Background: The announcement was undergoing line-by-line revision, and the choice of endorser also needed checking. Today: The team aligned announcement responsibilities with Offchain Labs and agreed that Offchain Labs would provide a named endorsement. Impact and next steps: With responsibilities assigned, the announcement had a clearer structure for describing support and a clearer boundary for review.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
Background: The announcement was undergoing line-by-line revision, and the choice of endorser also needed checking. If the public text described support too broadly, readers could struggle to distinguish the project's own plans from what a partner was willing to confirm under its name.
Today: The team aligned announcement responsibilities with Offchain Labs and agreed that Offchain Labs would provide a named endorsement. The discussion returned to the text: which passage would introduce the project in its own voice, and which would convey the partner's support? The writer separated out the proposed quotation for the partner to confirm, so that a circulating draft would not be mistaken for approved words.
Impact and next steps: With responsibilities assigned, the announcement had a clearer structure for describing support and a clearer boundary for review. The named endorsement still needed the partner's approval of its wording, while the project team continued refining its own product description. The next draft would show whether the two parts fit together.