Back to collectionRewards and resentment meet in the Raijin debate
Weekend conversation returned to an old question: beyond Raijin, what could disappointed participants still see in the project? Someone raised the old grievance that Raijin seemed to be all that remained. The examples of winners did not settle complaints about the airdrop or the project's direction, and the argument had yet to become a concrete plan.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
Weekend conversation returned to an old question: beyond Raijin, what could disappointed participants still see in the project? As the argument grew, the Night Watchman could tell that player rewards and broader community expectations no longer fit into a single answer.
Someone raised the old grievance that Raijin seemed to be all that remained. Another called the whole experience a complete disappointment and the airdrop terrible. That evening, the official account pushed back: many players had won competitions and received prizes, and had the critics seen the redesigned website? It ended with the familiar invitation to put any ideas into a proposal.
The examples of winners did not settle complaints about the airdrop or the project's direction, and the argument had yet to become a concrete plan. The Night Watchman decided to note the two demands tangled together in the chat: what players wanted improved and what longtime participants felt they had lost. He would then see whether anyone was willing to draft a proposal.