Back to collectionSisyphus Removes the Pool from His Supply Argument
After returning to the group, Sisyphus had closed his sell window during a pullback. While organizing his position notes today, he first listed the pool as a reason that circulating supply had fallen. That deletion narrowed his reasons for keeping the position.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
After returning to the group, Sisyphus had closed his sell window during a pullback. Yesterday, the community created a trading pool for a meme token and XAI on Robinhood Chain. He began watching uses beyond games, while also needing to distinguish what those uses actually changed.
While organizing his position notes today, he first listed the pool as a reason that circulating supply had fallen. Then he read that a reverse swap could remove XAI and crossed that item out, moving it under uses instead. The pool can absorb buying and also allow sales back; XAI placed in it remains in circulation and cannot be counted as locked.
That deletion narrowed his reasons for keeping the position. When he looks at the pool again, he will need to decide whether demand for swaps can persist, rather than subtracting the pool balance directly from supply. Yesterday’s added use still does not answer how long he should hold.