Back to collectionA reset restores one vote per person as community meetings move in-house
Background: The studio was weighing which chain should host its next release, and the community vote was meant to capture members’ views. Today: ETH moved back and forth near 4,500. Impact and next: Duplicate voting forced the team to correct how members expressed their views; the new vote made one vote per person the rule.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
Background: The studio was weighing which chain should host its next release, and the community vote was meant to capture members’ views. A-Zhen understood the engineering integration questions, while the Night Watchman cared about whether members could make their voices heard. The weekly community meeting also needed to move from an external platform into the team’s own voice room.
Today: ETH moved back and forth near 4,500. The studio put the question of which chain should host the next release to a community vote, with Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana as the three options. Less than an hour after voting opened, duplicate votes forced a full reset; the poll was reopened with one vote per person. That evening, the weekly community meeting was held in the studio’s own voice room for the first time, ending with a hand-raising Q&A.
Impact and next: Duplicate voting forced the team to correct how members expressed their views; the new vote made one vote per person the rule. The community meeting also moved from an outside platform into the studio’s own space. The Night Watchman planned to collect members’ questions about the poll and Q&A, while A-Zhen still needed to assess each chain’s integration requirements. The final chain choice remained unresolved.