Back to collectionThe Year-End Review Meets a Wallet Scam Warning
Background: The year-end review was getting underway, and the narrator had been borrowed as an editor during a busy stretch of studio updates. Today: BTC was at 51,000. Impact and next: The review was no longer just a summary of project progress; it also had to address risks members faced.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
Background: The year-end review was getting underway, and the narrator had been borrowed as an editor during a busy stretch of studio updates. The community had just seen its referral reward rolled back, and the announcement channel needed to help members distinguish normal activity from scams that could cost them wallet assets.
Today: BTC was at 51,000. As the narrator began organizing the review, the announcement channel warned of a new scam: someone airdrops a supposedly “redeemable” collectible to a wallet, then lures its recipient to connect the wallet to a website; once connected, assets are stolen, and there is no recovery for what is lost. The narrator therefore added community security concerns to the review.
Impact and next: The review was no longer just a summary of project progress; it also had to address risks members faced. The warning described the lure and the consequences, but could not identify every unfamiliar link for each person. The narrator planned to make the safety guidance prominent; how to keep it visible amid everyday chat remained unresolved.