Back to collectionThree Hours at the Whiteboard, Five Choices for the Community
Background: The proposed game chain had reached technical review. Today: In their first formal technical meeting with Offchain Labs, the two sides spent three hours at a whiteboard discussing the Orbit technology stack, an L3 architecture, and settlement to Arbitrum One. Impact and next steps: The technical discussion produced a framework for further questions, while the community gained a say in when the conversation would take place.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
Background: The proposed game chain had reached technical review. A-Zhen and the chain team needed to discuss their internal design with Offchain Labs. Meanwhile, the community had been waiting for a question and answer session where it could speak directly to the team.
Today: In their first formal technical meeting with Offchain Labs, the two sides spent three hours at a whiteboard discussing the Orbit technology stack, an L3 architecture, and settlement to Arbitrum One. The questions became more precise, although not every design choice was settled. That same day, an official announcement finally scheduled the long-awaited question and answer session. It offered five possible time slots for a community vote, with voting to finish the next day.
Impact and next steps: The technical discussion produced a framework for further questions, while the community gained a say in when the conversation would take place. A-Zhen needed to organize the unresolved points from the whiteboard. The announcement channel would wait for the vote before confirming a time.