Back to collectionPool design raises questions about reward variability
A community ambassador explained that pooled staking was intended to help participants with fewer keys reduce long gaps between rewards. The reply contrasted this design with individual staking, where a multiplier did not remove the possibility of a prolonged wait. This was an explanation of the intended mechanism, not a measured reduction in variance. Assessing that effect would require comparable reward histories; the exchange supplies no order-book depth or execution-cost measurement.
A community ambassador explained that pooled staking was intended to help participants with fewer keys reduce long gaps between rewards. The reply contrasted this design with individual staking, where a multiplier did not remove the possibility of a prolonged wait. This was an explanation of the intended mechanism, not a measured reduction in variance. Assessing that effect would require comparable reward histories; the exchange supplies no order-book depth or execution-cost measurement.