Back to collectionReward debate mixes daily receipts with per-challenge amounts
A participant illustrated a reported daily decline with 200 before halving, an expected 100 afterwards and receipts nearer 60. A Xai ambassador initially discussed amounts per challenge, then gave a separate example of 70 esXAI before halving and 34.5 esXAI afterwards, while pointing to winning keys and pool uptime. These are statements made in a support exchange, not reconciled account totals or a common measurement series. The daily example and the per-challenge example must not be treated as directly comparable observations.
A participant illustrated a reported daily decline with 200 before halving, an expected 100 afterwards and receipts nearer 60. A Xai ambassador initially discussed amounts per challenge, then gave a separate example of 70 esXAI before halving and 34.5 esXAI afterwards, while pointing to winning keys and pool uptime. These are statements made in a support exchange, not reconciled account totals or a common measurement series. The daily example and the per-challenge example must not be treated as directly comparable observations.
For research purposes, the unresolved issue is the bridge from network issuance to a particular participant's receipts: eligible challenges, successful submissions, distribution terms and the measurement window all need alignment. The discussion alone neither verifies the size of the reported loss nor diagnoses downtime as its cause. It also supplies no evidence for the earlier claim that a token-price rebound ended on this date.