Back to collectionStaking-tier follow-up exposes an unresolved communication gap
A participant asked when staking tiers would be adjusted after halving. A Xai ambassador initially replied that the tiers would remain the same and that changes were not expected. The participant then pointed to the earlier halving announcement, which said a formula-based adjustment would follow and that details would be shared. The ambassador acknowledged the point and said an update would be shared. This sequence records a request for clarification, not a completed change to staking parameters.
A participant asked when staking tiers would be adjusted after halving. A Xai ambassador initially replied that the tiers would remain the same and that changes were not expected. The participant then pointed to the earlier halving announcement, which said a formula-based adjustment would follow and that details would be shared. The ambassador acknowledged the point and said an update would be shared. This sequence records a request for clarification, not a completed change to staking parameters.
The earlier announcement and the follow-up reply are not interchangeable with deployed contract settings. An announced adjustment and a documented effective parameter are distinct research inputs. This conversation supplies no effective date or verified new threshold and does not support the earlier price-rebound and community-activity claims.