Withdrawal clarification and requests for advance notice of rule changes
A Xai ambassador corrected a member's claim that unstaking a genesis key required 6 months. The response specified two months, described as 60 days, for the genesis key and 7 days for other keys. This is the actual support clarification, not an approval of the member's proposed shorter lock. The distinction changes the withdrawal horizon described in the earlier account; it does not establish that any particular withdrawal transaction completed.
A Xai ambassador corrected a member's claim that unstaking a genesis key required 6 months. The response specified two months, described as 60 days, for the genesis key and 7 days for other keys. This is the actual support clarification, not an approval of the member's proposed shorter lock. The distinction changes the withdrawal horizon described in the earlier account; it does not establish that any particular withdrawal transaction completed.
A member also requested voting with esXAI or XAI and at least 1 week of notice before rule changes. The ambassador replied that the feedback would be forwarded. A request and an acknowledgment are not an enacted governance mechanism, a scheduled vote or an adopted notice period. For pool participants, the unresolved question was how changes would be communicated and decided, rather than whether this conversation itself had changed the rules.
Another participant described a progression from 80 esXAI per day to 40 after the halving and then 20 esXAI. The first amount explicitly names a daily basis; the message does not provide reconciled observation windows, pool composition or transaction records for the sequence. It is a personal reward report, not a network-wide return series or proof of the cause of each reduction. It cannot establish the earlier claim that a market rebound had ended.