Back to collectionA staking-governance question receives a direct response
A member asked whether a community vote had been held on changing staking-pool tiers and what future changes were planned. A Xai ambassador responded in the negative and said feedback was being actively collected. The response is explicitly attached to the question. The earlier description of an unanswered question was therefore inaccurate; acknowledgment and feedback collection are documented, even though no future timetable was supplied.
A member asked whether a community vote had been held on changing staking-pool tiers and what future changes were planned. A Xai ambassador responded in the negative and said feedback was being actively collected. The response is explicitly attached to the question. The earlier description of an unanswered question was therefore inaccurate; acknowledgment and feedback collection are documented, even though no future timetable was supplied.
Feedback collection is not equivalent to token-holder approval, a binding vote or an adopted governance process. The exchange contains no ballot, voting result or schedule for the next parameter change. For research into protocol governance, the supported observation is the ambassador's stated approach at that moment, not a comprehensive audit of every historical decision. The earlier price, unlock countdown and trending-panic claims are not established by this conversation.