Back to collectionYaku Claim Exposes a Gap in Expectations
The Yaku claim had just opened, and key holders were comparing the actual page with what they had expected. XAI fell further to USD 0.039, setting another all-time low. Before claiming, the dispute was about eligibility; afterward, it was about how to interpret the promise.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
The Yaku claim had just opened, and key holders were comparing the actual page with what they had expected. Sisyphus entered the claim process too. He cared most about what he would receive, while some in the group focused first on how many keys they held.
XAI fell further to USD 0.039, setting another all-time low. The Yaku airdrop immediately turned into an argument: someone recalled an earlier claim and asked whether more keys were supposed to mean more rewards. The official answer was direct: one key guaranteed only the minimum allocation from each partner; each partner decided the rest of its distribution. Sisyphus found that he first had to complete tasks and that the reward was an in-game item. He posted a screenshot of the interface to the group without a caption.
Before claiming, the dispute was about eligibility; afterward, it was about how to interpret the promise. The official explanation drew a line between a guaranteed minimum and partner-controlled distribution, but it did not remove the disappointment. Sisyphus's silent screenshot sent more people back to the page. The Night Watchman planned to ask separately about the task requirements and the allocation rules, so the issues would not stay tangled.