Key holders dispute access conditions and reward expectations

Blaszka challenged the benefits attached to holding sentry keys, saying the experience did not match earlier expectations of task-free access and larger allocations for larger holdings. The complaint was explicitly about project delivery rather than token price. It raised a concrete question for assessing the key's economics: which benefits follow from ownership alone, and which require additional participation?

In reply, another holder, Joao, distinguished Genesis distributions from sentry-key airdrops and pointed to esXAI earned through staking. These mechanisms have different eligibility conditions; combining them into a single expected return obscures what a holder must do to qualify. Joao also anticipated further distributions, but the reply did not provide a dated allocation schedule or establish that the speaker was making an official commitment.