Back to collectionThe proposal is public; the questions need precision
Background: Since Vanguard claims opened, the 30-day unlock schedule and eligibility rules had repeatedly sparked arguments. Today: Someone posted the proposal behind the airdrop again, noting that anyone could read it on the governance page. Impact and next steps: The public text gave the argument a common starting point, but could not answer every person's eligibility question by itself.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
Background: Since Vanguard claims opened, the 30-day unlock schedule and eligibility rules had repeatedly sparked arguments. The proposal was on the governance page, but many people asking questions had seen only retellings in the group and could not identify the clause at issue.
Today: Someone posted the proposal behind the airdrop again, noting that anyone could read it on the governance page. The discussion continued: one questioner mixed up the unlock schedule approved by vote with whether they personally qualified for an allocation. The narrator asked them to identify the clause they meant and compare it with the published claim rules, so that every objection would not be dismissed with 'read the proposal.'
Impact and next steps: The public text gave the argument a common starting point, but could not answer every person's eligibility question by itself. The narrator planned to sort the next round of questions by unlock schedule, badge conditions, and claim steps. Any ambiguity left after reading the text would merit a more focused follow-up.