Back to collectionAirdrop timing dispute exposes delivery and communication risks
A Xai community reply said airdrops were planned for 2025 but that independent partners controlled when they were ready, rather than the responding team. An edited follow-up described the distributions as subject to change and not guaranteed by that team. No partner-by-partner timetable or remaining allocation schedule accompanied the response. The important dependency was delivery by external campaign operators, not simply the passage of another month.
A Xai community reply said airdrops were planned for 2025 but that independent partners controlled when they were ready, rather than the responding team. An edited follow-up described the distributions as subject to change and not guaranteed by that team. No partner-by-partner timetable or remaining allocation schedule accompanied the response. The important dependency was delivery by external campaign operators, not simply the passage of another month.
The follow-up also disputed a claim about misleading advertising and warned that definitive legal accusations without full context would lead to a permanent ban. This was the account's stated position, not a regulator's finding or a legal ruling on airdrop obligations. Both the delivery uncertainty and the response to criticism matter to an assessment of communication risk; the exchange neither proves a regulatory breach nor settles the underlying question of what was promised.