Back to collectionBurning Was Already Part of Redemption
The weekend group was nearly silent. The member asked whether tokens would be burned. That answer changed the question from whether a future measure might arrive to how an existing process works; it calculated no return for anyone.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
The weekend group was nearly silent. Holders were still absorbing the low price and the redemption queue. One member placed hope in a token burn as a way to reduce circulating supply, without knowing whether the mechanism already existed.
The member asked whether tokens would be burned. An operator replied that burning had accompanied redemption continuously since launch and was described in the documentation. The Night Watchman brought the discussion back to the redemption process: check the chosen waiting period and discount first, then ask at which step the burn occurs.
That answer changed the question from whether a future measure might arrive to how an existing process works; it calculated no return for anyone. The questioner planned to read the documentation before deciding whether to redeem. Others still wanted to understand what continued burning meant for supply.