A direct-airdrop proposal leaves the percentage unspecified

A holder using the name Dev proposed allocating a fixed percentage of total supply as a direct airdrop exclusively for key holders. The post presented this as recognition of early support and explicitly distinguished it from staking rewards. It did not specify the percentage, an approved allocation or a distribution schedule. The author's display name does not itself establish a team role, and the post was a holder proposal rather than a treasury decision.

Earlier that day, Dhruv had answered a different holder's question about benefits by referring to airdrops whose criteria were set by partner games. That reply preceded the new proposal and was not its approval. Partner-defined eligibility for an existing benefit and a new request for a share of total supply have different funding and entitlement implications; one cannot substitute for the other.