Back to collectionKey Holders Ask for a Direct Share
As January ended, longtime Sentry Key holders were still asking what their commitment might bring them. January closed at USD 0.0120: XAI had climbed above USD 0.028 during the month, then fallen below where it began. The difference between the two positions was now explicit: the proposal sought a fixed allocation for key holders, while the official answer concerned airdrops with conditions set by individual game partners.
A creative chronicle combining project history with imagined scenes. Story events are not verification of network activity.
As January ended, longtime Sentry Key holders were still asking what their commitment might bring them. The Night Watchman was both a node operator and a community member who heard their complaints. He needed to tell whether a new proposal and the existing answer about airdrops addressed the same thing.
January closed at USD 0.0120: XAI had climbed above USD 0.028 during the month, then fallen below where it began. A new forum proposal called for a fixed percentage of the total token supply to be airdropped directly to Sentry Key holders. Its author said those holders had committed real money for the long term and that recent events had left the community deeply dissatisfied. They wanted a direct airdrop, not staking rewards. That same day, someone in the group asked whether holding a key could still bring an airdrop. The official answer was yes, but partner game studios would set the conditions.
The difference between the two positions was now explicit: the proposal sought a fixed allocation for key holders, while the official answer concerned airdrops with conditions set by individual game partners. The Night Watchman planned to bring that distinction into the forum discussion so that a simple “yes” would not be mistaken for acceptance of the proposal. Whether any fixed share would be approved remained unresolved.