Back to collectionA holder's request leaves future distribution timing open
raoulvdb asked when further airdrops would arrive for the keys he held. On March 29, Diablo posted a pointer to the airdrop channel, but the record does not bind that message as a direct reply to the question. No new distribution date appeared in these messages. The distinction matters: a route to existing information does not answer a request for a future delivery timetable, and the unresolved timing should remain visible without being recast as permanent silence.
raoulvdb asked when further airdrops would arrive for the keys he held. On March 29, Diablo posted a pointer to the airdrop channel, but the record does not bind that message as a direct reply to the question. No new distribution date appeared in these messages. The distinction matters: a route to existing information does not answer a request for a future delivery timetable, and the unresolved timing should remain visible without being recast as permanent silence.