Back to collectionThe utility debate moves beyond the burn mechanism
finixas.lt argued that burning tokens would not solve weak demand without substantive uses. Diablo responded by describing XAI as the gas token on Xai and pointing to its connection with esXAI staking, while inviting additional applications. The disagreement concerned the scale of economic demand, not merely whether a utility mechanism existed. The reply explained intended uses but supplied no usage series with which to evaluate the holder's demand concern.
finixas.lt argued that burning tokens would not solve weak demand without substantive uses. Diablo responded by describing XAI as the gas token on Xai and pointing to its connection with esXAI staking, while inviting additional applications. The disagreement concerned the scale of economic demand, not merely whether a utility mechanism existed. The reply explained intended uses but supplied no usage series with which to evaluate the holder's demand concern.