Back to collectionA key-holder campaign request meets a disputed reward history
On June 8, rupeshchy.eth requested an activity to re-engage the community and separately asked for rewards for buyers in the last key-sale round. Dev agreed with the reward request. Dhruv asked the following day what the proposed activity meant and how it would benefit Xai. The holder answered that ecosystem activity needed reviving and said the expected 12 airdrops had not produced a single receipt for them.
On June 8, rupeshchy.eth requested an activity to re-engage the community and separately asked for rewards for buyers in the last key-sale round. Dev agreed with the reward request. Dhruv asked the following day what the proposed activity meant and how it would benefit Xai. The holder answered that ecosystem activity needed reviving and said the expected 12 airdrops had not produced a single receipt for them.
Dhruv replied on June 10 that there had been 4 airdrops and that claim instructions had been announced. On June 11, the holder objected that those programs had ended the previous year and said they had received none. The follow-up matters: the question received an answer, but the disagreement over access and outcomes remained. Neither exchange announced a new campaign or established the holder's eligibility for a particular distribution.