Back to collectionParticipants report a primary-wallet mismatch in staking quests
Participants questioned how Galxe associated staking eligibility with a primary wallet. One key holder described keeping keys and staked esXAI in a separate wallet, adding it as secondary to an existing profile, and still failing to complete the Chapter 4 staking-pool quest. Another participant reported the same difficulty and suggested using Discord roles. These are specific user reports, not a verified conclusion that every key holder was excluded or that a replacement eligibility mechanism had been adopted.
Participants questioned how Galxe associated staking eligibility with a primary wallet. One key holder described keeping keys and staked esXAI in a separate wallet, adding it as secondary to an existing profile, and still failing to complete the Chapter 4 staking-pool quest. Another participant reported the same difficulty and suggested using Discord roles. These are specific user reports, not a verified conclusion that every key holder was excluded or that a replacement eligibility mechanism had been adopted.
The reports illustrate tension between separating wallets for security and linking activity to an existing identity profile. They do not establish the platform's complete account rules, a safe workaround or a successful resolution. The suggested role-based check remained a participant proposal. Research into onboarding therefore distinguishes account-linking friction from token ownership and reward eligibility; the reported failure is not evidence of the earlier price-level narrative.