Back to collectionPool allocation proposals expose competing staking incentives
Participants debated how to assemble a diamond-tier pool and distribute its rewards. One proposed a 1:8000 key-to-token ratio and an allocation written as 0:95:5; another said the arrangement could be attempted if 1000 keys were assembled. A follow-up proposed 1000 keys against 8 million tokens. These were community proposals, not a published configuration change or a verified pool launch. The abbreviated allocation did not consistently label each recipient category.
Participants debated how to assemble a diamond-tier pool and distribute its rewards. One proposed a 1:8000 key-to-token ratio and an allocation written as 0:95:5; another said the arrangement could be attempted if 1000 keys were assembled. A follow-up proposed 1000 keys against 8 million tokens. These were community proposals, not a published configuration change or a verified pool launch. The abbreviated allocation did not consistently label each recipient category.
The discussion centered on whether additional esXAI deposits would dilute the share sought by the existing participants. An esXAI holder objected that the proposed allocation discouraged their participation. That disagreement illustrates a potential conflict between concentrating rewards for an existing group and attracting outside deposits; it does not demonstrate a network-wide policy or a technical ban on deposits.
One participant also claimed to retain 100% in a personally controlled pool and described an overall 3.5-fold figure. The statement supplies neither a return period nor a verifiable calculation, wallet history or independently measured reward rate. It cannot be treated as an annual yield, a return available to other depositors, or Night Ash's operating performance.