Back to collectionA price-support demand receives a tokenomics reply and ticket follow-up
kostascy had asked on April 2 for measures to improve token value after substantial spending on nodes. Dhruv's April 3 response pointed to existing burn documentation, live ecosystem products and RIFTSTORM beta, arguing that usage mattered to long-term value. kostascy then said a support ticket was open, and Dhruv acknowledged taking it up. The exchange contains a response and follow-up, but no newly authorised price-support action or documented recovery of the holder's investment.
kostascy had asked on April 2 for measures to improve token value after substantial spending on nodes. Dhruv's April 3 response pointed to existing burn documentation, live ecosystem products and RIFTSTORM beta, arguing that usage mattered to long-term value. kostascy then said a support ticket was open, and Dhruv acknowledged taking it up. The exchange contains a response and follow-up, but no newly authorised price-support action or documented recovery of the holder's investment.